Reviews based on real application access
YeshID audits what users can actually do inside applications, including roles, permissions, scopes, and entitlements. Reviewers see meaningful access context instead of opaque group names or inherited roles. This makes decisions faster and materially improves audit quality.
One review model across automated and manual apps
Not every application supports SCIM or APIs. YeshID runs audits across both integrated and manual systems using the same review framework. Automated apps support direct remediation. Manual apps still produce complete, reviewable records with tracked follow-up actions so nothing disappears after approval.
Policy-aware reviews that highlight drift
Reviews are evaluated against policy. YeshID shows where access aligns with policy and where it has drifted due to exceptions, manual changes, or time-based access that never expired. This turns audits into a control mechanism, not a recurring surprise.
Structured reviewer workflows without email chains
Assign reviewers by role, manager, app owner, or security team. Require justification where needed. Escalate sensitive decisions automatically. Reviewers see what matters to them and nothing more. No spreadsheets. No inbox archaeology.
Built-in remediation, not post-audit cleanup
When access is denied or flagged, YeshID can revoke, downgrade, or expire access directly for integrated apps. For manual systems, required actions are tracked until completion. Audit findings do not end as PDFs. They end as resolved access changes.
Audit trails auditors can actually follow
Every review captures who reviewed access, what decision was made, what policy applied, and what changed as a result. Reports are complete, consistent, and exportable without reconstruction. You can answer auditor questions without reopening the audit or re-running reports.